The Mechanics of Termination

There are five things to bear in mind when terminating a contract due to the other parties failure to complete:

1.     Set a firm completion date (“Completion Date”). To make it clear that it must be delivered on a certain day, use the term “time is of the essence” in the contract. 

2.    Depending on the circumstances, if you do not use the term “time of the essence” and the other party does not compete on the appointed day, or there is no appointed day for completion you may need to serve written notice giving a reasonable period appointing a day by which the other party must sell to or purchase from you (“Notice to Complete”). For instance, in the purchase of a property which is not “time of the essence” if the seller does not sell on the date appointed you serve a Notice to Complete giving say three weeks notice of the Completion Date.

3.    Where you have adhered to the above procedures and the other party is in breach of contract if it fails to complete on the Completion Date (“Breach of Contract”). The innocent party has two choices:

a.    Affirm the contract so that it continues and the defaulting party must honour its obligations under the contract. The innocent party can sue the defaulting party for any loss suffered due to the Breach of Contract; or the innocent party can serve notice terminating the contract.

4.    The innocent party will often keep options open by writing to the other party indicating that the innocent party has the right to affirm or terminate, however it reserves its right to do so.

5.    Where neither party tries to complete the contract on the Completion Date a contract is still “on foot” and both parties can try again giving reasonable notice to the other appointing a day to complete. 

 

These are also the things to bear in mind if you are potentially the defaulting party as it is possible to turn the tables if the innocent party gets it wrong.

Conclusion

Therefore, you cannot throw a fit and terminate a contract for some minor breach unless being fussy is reasonable in the circumstances.

 

You will find your lawyer reluctant to make any sudden moves.

 

Does this all seem a little complicated to you? Well it is. It is very easy to get sued if you spit the dummy or offer an open goal. So don’t!



© Paul Brennan 2018. All rights Reserved.

Location: Sunshine Coast Queensland 4575, Australia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Choosing the right lawyer

Image
I think most of  us  like feeling sorry for ourselves from time to time, or all the time in some cases.  However, in my experience, it is far more satisfying for other people to feel sorry for you and then for you to reluctantly join in.     When dying, even your enemies could feel a little sorry to see you go.     Regrettably, this death bed “perk” has been devalued lately by so many dying people just not going due to some last minute medical or spiritual tinkering.  Professionals call it the “Long Goodbye Syndrome”. Legally this really can be very irritating, especially for the beneficiaries.    However, even if it is just a “dummy run”, preparing for death can be a positive experience provided that you choose the right lawyer.  Ideally, choose one a few years younger than yourself.  An older lawyer could steal the limelight and a young lawyer may just not “give a monkey’s”.     You need to try and convince your doctor that you are worth saving just in case he or she comes across a l
Read more

The most popular podcasts

Image
  Over three years ago, Paul Brennan started  The Law ® podcast .  Since that time, the five most popular podcasts have been: The man with four lawyers Insolvent trading-is everybody at it? How far are you prepared to go? Winning not always a joyous experience Why read The Art of War Search for the Law ® podcast by Paul Brennan or  click here . It is on Apple, Spotify and many other platforms. The Law ® podcast - Short clips on legal topics with a quirky outlook, but of real, everyday application with wry humour and the odd belly laugh.   #podcast #law SPONSORED BY
Read more

What’s in a name? Trade marks and the law

Image
Just as in horror movies when the hero decides to enter the spooky room at end of the hall there are plenty of people advising against “Do it Yourself” (“DIY”) trade marks. In fact, there is a whole industry of lawyers and trade mark agents advising against it. The fun of trade marks is that they stop your competitors copying the unique way you do something. In the case of Coca Cola this is quite understandable. In the case of the New Zealand ice cream seller who by registering a musical trade mark stopped their competitors playing Green Sleeves, it is a service to humanity. Who could not support Harley Davidson wishing to trade mark the Harley Davidson engine rumble? This could keep so many of those ageing imitators off our streets? When someone is considering whether or not to instruct a lawyer to register a trade mark on their behalf, they will probably take note of the government website, which is so invitingly user-friendly (always a dangerous sign). It offers a procedure which is
Read more