Fights Over the Carcass



Here is a seven point checklist of the predictable disputes between shareholders/partners who do not have a partnership or shareholders agreement:

1.  Bidding for the business name and domain name registrations belonging to the partnership -Note that these registrations do not mean that you own the name as only a registered trademark confers ownership. Therefore, they have limited value. You could agree not to use the registrations, but this is a waste, isn't it?

2.  Preparing final accounts- Should this not be done by an independent accountant so it is all above board? Well yes, if you both don't mind paying more for an accountant who is unfamiliar with the business, charging more and taking longer.

3.  Competition- You could agree to split the client list and look after your own clients. But what fun is that? Outright war may be inevitable, especially if you are the stronger partner.

4.  Threatening to sue your ex-partner- You may see this as one of the benefits of not having a partnership/shareholders agreement. Often partnership/shareholders agreements provide that no court action can be commenced without an attempt at mediation. Alternatively, it can provide for arbitration which lacks the drama of threatening to slap a writ on your ex-partner.

5.  Working out who paid for what- With GST it is usually too easy to work out who paid for what and especially if there is not much money in the kitty this argument usually runs out of steam.

6.  IP rights - These can be in documents, logos and ways the partnership did things.

7.  Collection of the debts owing to the partnership -This can be an exercise in one partner chasing debts from friends of the other partner.

Many of these predictable disputes can be anticipated by a partnership/shareholders agreement which provides a mechanism in the event of a breakup. 

To fight over the carcass of the business normally involves legal costs. Therefore, only fight if it benefits you (not just to wind up your partner). Ask yourself, 'What's in it for me?’. If the answer is 'nothing much', opt to shake hands and move on.

Conclusion

Most people insist on having a shareholders’ or partnership agreement but usually only the second time around.




© Paul Brennan 2008-2018. All rights Reserved.

Location: Birtinya, Sunshine Coast, Queensland

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What’s in a name? Trade marks and the law

Image
Just as in horror movies when the hero decides to enter the spooky room at end of the hall there are plenty of people advising against “Do it Yourself” (“DIY”) trade marks. In fact, there is a whole industry of lawyers and trade mark agents advising against it. The fun of trade marks is that they stop your competitors copying the unique way you do something. In the case of Coca Cola this is quite understandable. In the case of the New Zealand ice cream seller who by registering a musical trade mark stopped their competitors playing Green Sleeves, it is a service to humanity. Who could not support Harley Davidson wishing to trade mark the Harley Davidson engine rumble? This could keep so many of those ageing imitators off our streets? When someone is considering whether or not to instruct a lawyer to register a trade mark on their behalf, they will probably take note of the government website, which is so invitingly user-friendly (always a dangerous sign). It offers a procedure which is...
Read more

The most popular podcasts

Image
  Over three years ago, Paul Brennan started  The Law ® podcast .  Since that time, the five most popular podcasts have been: The man with four lawyers Insolvent trading-is everybody at it? How far are you prepared to go? Winning not always a joyous experience Why read The Art of War Search for the Law ® podcast by Paul Brennan or  click here . It is on Apple, Spotify and many other platforms. The Law ® podcast - Short clips on legal topics with a quirky outlook, but of real, everyday application with wry humour and the odd belly laugh.   #podcast #law SPONSORED BY
Read more

Coping with the Wicked Step Mom in your life

Image
Why did Walt Disney not have something cheesy to say about Step Mothers? Answer: they are a thoroughly bad lot, that’s why. Luckily you decided not to marry again (yet) and although suspicious of the new lady in your life, your adult children have not been too hostile (yet). After three years or so, your minds will turn to making wills. She has no children and is prepared lovingly to give everything to you. You want to see her right but to look after your own children too. You decide to consider carefully what your children will want. Within seconds you guess, “everything”. She will want your home. You give it to her for the duration of her life and then it will go to your children. On your death your children will do the “math” and decide that “your lady” has at least 30 years to go and may see them out. She may make a court claim for full ownership of the house. This is either because she is, understandably, fearful about her future security or a bit of an old bag depending on who yo...
Read more